Honestly I think part of the argument against it is the fear mongering idea that it itself is responsible for luring problemic people into certain spaces where crimes could be organized for example. But I never liked using this to blame the existence of any victimless fiction itself when the act of such organizing (e.g. the snakething situation) is a specific situation alone that could hopefully be prevented as a SEPARATE situation. If we do blame victimless fiction itself, we might as well all anthro victimless art assuming even standard anthro art "lured" the wrong kind of people too. Like you maybe said, it really should be about preventing the organizational stuff without banning any victimless art.
Heck I would say that victimless fiction can also lure problemic people away from kids, animals, and other vulnerable types during certain timing scenarios and I can actually see examples of it. Sadly some people think it's always bad despite the fact that its always been more of an invidual issue and scenerio. I can see scenarios where it can slow down crime depending on many different kinds of things. Even some expert researchers debatated this topic. It's a tricky situation in the end I guess. To be clear, this isn't meant to be about certain blantent broad support messages where such broad messaging is dangerous, but rather meant to be more individual case in some cases.
Honestly I think part of the argument against it is the fear mongering idea that it itself is responsible for luring problemic people into certain spaces where crimes could be organized for example. But I never liked using this to blame the existence of any victimless fiction itself when the act of such organizing (e.g. the snakething situation) is a specific situation alone that could hopefully be prevented as a SEPARATE situation. If we do blame victimless fiction itself, we might as well all anthro victimless art assuming even standard anthro art "lured" the wrong kind of people too. Like you maybe said, it really should be about preventing the organizational stuff without banning any victimless art.
Heck I would say that victimless fiction can also lure problemic people away from kids, animals, and other vulnerable types during certain timing scenarios and I can actually see examples of it. Sadly some people think it's always bad despite the fact that its always been more of an invidual issue and scenerio. I can see scenarios where it can slow down crime depending on many different kinds of things. Even some expert researchers debatated this topic. It's a tricky situation in the end I guess. To be clear, this isn't meant to be about certain blantent broad support messages where such broad messaging is dangerous, but rather meant to be more individual case in some cases.