Thanks for the civil response.
I'm glad you don't seem to be the person to try to censor someone who has a different but reasonible opinion that may seem very off if I'm assuming correctly of course.
As for the other part, I am not sure if you are saying someone who groomed cannot be redeemable like forever or you meant a person currently attempting to do try that. I tend to believe that any intentional choice that is bad is based off a broken brain which ideally should be fixed in the future as someone who prefers a neurolaw justice.
By the way sorry if I seemed a little late. Was taking a break. Haha
Thanks for the civil response.
I'm glad you don't seem to be the person to try to censor someone who has a different but reasonible opinion that may seem very off if I'm assuming correctly of course.
As for the other part, I am not sure if you are saying someone who groomed cannot be redeemable like forever or you meant a person currently attempting to do try that. I tend to believe that any intentional choice that is bad is based off a broken brain which ideally should be fixed in the future as someone who prefers a neurolaw justice.
By the way sorry if I seemed a little late. Was taking a break. Haha