See, the problem is, Rakuen, most people just straight up think you're lying (I don't, but we've gone over that), and honestly your position is so weird the only other option is that you're, well, being kind of stupid. So, kind of pick your poison, lying or stupid (though, I suppose they aren't mutually exclusive). Either way, the truth is that you are not the person to make the "you people can't distinguish between reality and fiction" argument because everyone assumes you either a. are a lying pedophile or b. have trouble sorting reality and "depictions" yourself.
I don't have to deliberately misrepresent you. It's kind of automatic. I'm actually bending over backwards to give you any benefit of the doubt. Most people assume people defending something have a reason for doing that; your advocasy of child pornography makes it seem like you're, well, a pedophile. And don't tell me that's an illogical assumption, you've done the same thing yourself; in the comments to the article about book banning, you automatically assumed partisan bias was at play rather than actual love of free speech, and, like, no duh.
Furthermore, I've also seen other people spouting this "failure to distinguish between fictional and real content" line elsewhere word for word already, so I doubt you even came up with it to begin with and are just spouting a talking point. Well, don't do that. First of all, it's a bad faith argument that assumes everyone on one side is mentally handicapped (to be fair, everyone is bad faith assuming your side is mangy pedophiles, but two wrongs don't make a right), but second of all, get your own material, better suited to you, personally.
See, the problem is, Rakuen, most people just straight up think you're lying (I don't, but we've gone over that), and honestly your position is so weird the only other option is that you're, well, being kind of stupid. So, kind of pick your poison, lying or stupid (though, I suppose they aren't mutually exclusive). Either way, the truth is that you are not the person to make the "you people can't distinguish between reality and fiction" argument because everyone assumes you either a. are a lying pedophile or b. have trouble sorting reality and "depictions" yourself.
I don't have to deliberately misrepresent you. It's kind of automatic. I'm actually bending over backwards to give you any benefit of the doubt. Most people assume people defending something have a reason for doing that; your advocasy of child pornography makes it seem like you're, well, a pedophile. And don't tell me that's an illogical assumption, you've done the same thing yourself; in the comments to the article about book banning, you automatically assumed partisan bias was at play rather than actual love of free speech, and, like, no duh.
Furthermore, I've also seen other people spouting this "failure to distinguish between fictional and real content" line elsewhere word for word already, so I doubt you even came up with it to begin with and are just spouting a talking point. Well, don't do that. First of all, it's a bad faith argument that assumes everyone on one side is mentally handicapped (to be fair, everyone is bad faith assuming your side is mangy pedophiles, but two wrongs don't make a right), but second of all, get your own material, better suited to you, personally.