Creative Commons license icon

Reply to comment

I thought it might be that discussion. I'm afraid you are still misreading even though you were corrected back then. You've also stretched my position which was never advocating for it but explaining the position based on the evidence that was available and the potential for harm reduction.

Even in the other link I had to correct you for misreading my positions. It's starting to feel like you are deliberately trying to misrepresent my views even when I state them explicitly.

"If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind."
~John Stuart Mill~

Reply

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <img> <b> <i> <s> <blockquote> <ul> <ol> <li> <table> <tr> <td> <th> <sub> <sup> <object> <embed> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <dl> <dt> <dd> <param> <center> <strong> <q> <cite> <code> <em>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This test is to prevent automated spam submissions.
Leave empty.