Creative Commons license icon

Reply to comment

You've doubled up a link, so I can't see what the dispute was. It's really confusing because it sounds like people were upset that she invoked a dead person as support for something (I can't comment, not knowing his views or what was actually said) but also because she said furry music should actually be furry.

That last part is the one that is so strange, though I noted long ago that for some reason just being music made by a fur seems to be enough justification to call it furry music by some people (https://www.flayrah.com/6010/what-furry-music). That just seems stupid. As I said before, my and Uncle Kage's science is not furry science because we are both scientists. A landscape drawn by a fur doesn't become furry art, there does have to be some actual furry content. I don't see why music would be different nor why that should be in any way controversial.

"If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind."
~John Stuart Mill~

Reply

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <img> <b> <i> <s> <blockquote> <ul> <ol> <li> <table> <tr> <td> <th> <sub> <sup> <object> <embed> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <dl> <dt> <dd> <param> <center> <strong> <q> <cite> <code> <em>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This test is to prevent automated spam submissions.
Leave empty.