Creative Commons license icon

Reply to comment

However, that isn't really what today's AI is used for; it's not innocent and profit driven.

Eh, I can clearly see examples of AI usage that doesn't rely on profit involving copyright infringement circumvention and isn't major? For example, I can go to one of those popular AI tools and then use it to create a cool innocent dinosaur picture and admire it in private without profit involved for example. I don't see that different than looking at an official picture of modern Mickey Mouse and downloading it. If you mean that using the tool somehow generates revenue for the corporation while it could be argued that such corporation is generally causing harm then maybe (I am unclear about what counts as a fault here) I can see, but then what about certain AI tools designed to only use any lawful image that would fall under specific permissions and/or specific public domain material?

Also didn't you just literally used the tool yourself for an 'innocent' reason such primary for the purpose of specific commentary on here? Not trying to be this guy but I really wanted to point that out as I sense conflation. haha Though I might be looking at the comment wrong. If it wasn't AI art then my bad for this statement.

Reply

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <img> <b> <i> <s> <blockquote> <ul> <ol> <li> <table> <tr> <td> <th> <sub> <sup> <object> <embed> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <dl> <dt> <dd> <param> <center> <strong> <q> <cite> <code> <em>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This test is to prevent automated spam submissions.
Leave empty.