Flayrah is my hobby. See, that you don't get that tells me it's not me, you're just an idiot.
Also, angry about something; I don't know if it's actually the topic at hand (if that's the case, go with God, my child; just, you know, check your fire, buddy) or if you just like fights. If you just want to fight, sure whatever, I already told you this is my hobby, but if we're going to fight stupid, let's fight about something a bit more stupid, you know? Can we do that? Like, the Florida situation is pretty fucked up, but there's not a lot of nuance there, actually. Like, it's bad, on that we both agree (unless you're just trolling), and the fact that we just don't like each other doesn't have much bearing on the matter. This response to the anon #12, this part is pretty good:
Wearing fursuits
That's your answer
This law and the rabid bigots behind it conflate drag and similar expression with "adult behavior". Mrs. Doubtfire reading a book to kids is considered "adult"
I'm going to quibble, however, this should've been cut:
by the vague, overreaching law
Attacking the law on it's "vagueness" is, I'm going to opine, not helping, because saying there are cases of drag that are "okay" implies there are cases of drag that are "not okay." Or, put another way, saying "this will outlaw unintended stuff" implies that the real intent of the law, what it's actually intended to outlaw, is okay to outlaw. I'd also quibble that drag and fursuits, even innocent versions, are considered "adult" by vague, overreaching lawmakers, and that's the real issue.
But that's just my two cents. Otherwise, like, tone down the aggression; that's my job. The ACLU may be more experienced at court cases, but I've got way more experience at pissing off random anons, as I'm sure you can attest.
Flayrah is my hobby. See, that you don't get that tells me it's not me, you're just an idiot.
Also, angry about something; I don't know if it's actually the topic at hand (if that's the case, go with God, my child; just, you know, check your fire, buddy) or if you just like fights. If you just want to fight, sure whatever, I already told you this is my hobby, but if we're going to fight stupid, let's fight about something a bit more stupid, you know? Can we do that? Like, the Florida situation is pretty fucked up, but there's not a lot of nuance there, actually. Like, it's bad, on that we both agree (unless you're just trolling), and the fact that we just don't like each other doesn't have much bearing on the matter. This response to the anon #12, this part is pretty good:
I'm going to quibble, however, this should've been cut:
Attacking the law on it's "vagueness" is, I'm going to opine, not helping, because saying there are cases of drag that are "okay" implies there are cases of drag that are "not okay." Or, put another way, saying "this will outlaw unintended stuff" implies that the real intent of the law, what it's actually intended to outlaw, is okay to outlaw. I'd also quibble that drag and fursuits, even innocent versions, are considered "adult" by vague, overreaching lawmakers, and that's the real issue.
But that's just my two cents. Otherwise, like, tone down the aggression; that's my job. The ACLU may be more experienced at court cases, but I've got way more experience at pissing off random anons, as I'm sure you can attest.