Hey, sorry for not responding for a while. Kept forgetting I commented here!
I mainly asked because of I often see ethics on two sides (culture of copying and artists) of this whole AI war thing and I often seen a few arguments on the anti-AI art side that felt conflicting with the rights of copying involving specific culture practices, such as copying a 'manga' style.
For your first part, I'm assuming the issue is that such machine is using the Copyrighted works, correct? Because if so then I can fully understand and would probably use a similar rule if not more strict. Though the moral reasoning is something I'm still fuzzy on since it's possible an artist can manually copy a style (a practice that often happens in many genre culture) and have new creative arts too. I think that's why I was worried about relying on backlash at times. Though one thing that can break this is due to how fast AI might be. With this said, I'm not saying you need to get rid of the rule, by the way.
For the second part, I think I was asking because there already are certain culture practices that already uses some characters far after death, and I wasn't sure if the rule was banning AI usage of the non-profit characters infinitely or within the limited years. Like I'm not sure if the rule prohibits someone from using a free average character as a prompt that fell into public domain (say 100 years after death), without permission.
Hey, sorry for not responding for a while. Kept forgetting I commented here!
I mainly asked because of I often see ethics on two sides (culture of copying and artists) of this whole AI war thing and I often seen a few arguments on the anti-AI art side that felt conflicting with the rights of copying involving specific culture practices, such as copying a 'manga' style.
For your first part, I'm assuming the issue is that such machine is using the Copyrighted works, correct? Because if so then I can fully understand and would probably use a similar rule if not more strict. Though the moral reasoning is something I'm still fuzzy on since it's possible an artist can manually copy a style (a practice that often happens in many genre culture) and have new creative arts too. I think that's why I was worried about relying on backlash at times. Though one thing that can break this is due to how fast AI might be. With this said, I'm not saying you need to get rid of the rule, by the way.
For the second part, I think I was asking because there already are certain culture practices that already uses some characters far after death, and I wasn't sure if the rule was banning AI usage of the non-profit characters infinitely or within the limited years. Like I'm not sure if the rule prohibits someone from using a free average character as a prompt that fell into public domain (say 100 years after death), without permission.
For the last part, I think I understand.