Creative Commons license icon

Reply to comment

To be fair, I find this decision based off what might be considered a 'moral outrage' and that's what actually bothers me about this ban. If this was more about the fear of potential Copyright infringement and/or other trouble involving law, then I would understand more.

Why ban good pictures that were heavily more creative through generation just because what, it copies an artist's style? Or a bunch of multiple pictures to be used for what might be ruled as transformative? What's the difference between that and what thousands of furry artists has always been doing? Just a machine. But again, if this ban was out of uncertainty of potential legal issues, then I would not be as much bothered.

We seriously need to expand the public domain with new good arts, assuming a lot of these AI arts can be public domain of course. There is the fact that AI-generation programs can sometimes help create new good shapes to be inspired for good works. Does the owner of FA have problems with many arts inspired by a result of one too?

Reply

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <img> <b> <i> <s> <blockquote> <ul> <ol> <li> <table> <tr> <td> <th> <sub> <sup> <object> <embed> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <dl> <dt> <dd> <param> <center> <strong> <q> <cite> <code> <em>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This test is to prevent automated spam submissions.
Leave empty.