I'd like to see an analysis of the Ursa's RALists (Recommended Anthro List)
and how what in RALs compare with what makes it into list of Ursa Awards nominees.
ie.
1) what type of works are more likely to be in Ursa's RALs (short vid vs video series? etc)
2) what works made it into being a Ursa award nomineee, despite not being listed in UMA's RAL for that year.
3) what type of works are morely like to have made it into shortlist of Ursa award nominees. (does a short vid have a better than then a video series, or vice versa??)
edit: and do paper comics have a harder time getting into either list (RAL or Award nominees) compared with comics available online?
@Sonious (or whoever has time for this project):
I'd like to see an analysis of the Ursa's RALists (Recommended Anthro List)
and how what in RALs compare with what makes it into list of Ursa Awards nominees.
ie.
1) what type of works are more likely to be in Ursa's RALs (short vid vs video series? etc)
2) what works made it into being a Ursa award nomineee, despite not being listed in UMA's RAL for that year.
3) what type of works are morely like to have made it into shortlist of Ursa award nominees. (does a short vid have a better than then a video series, or vice versa??)
edit: and do paper comics have a harder time getting into either list (RAL or Award nominees) compared with comics available online?