Unfortunately you didn't offer any evidence that the people opposing this instance of censorship are in favour of censorship in certain circumstances - just a casual assertion that many are. You may well be right, but without proof, it comes across as cantankerous ax-grinding.
You could've said something like "I suspect they're really just doing it to support the gay stuff, but hopefully the library can use the funding to resist all forms of library censorship", and it would've gotten your point across effectively, without seeming churlish about Sonious not writing a fourth line to the title to clarify that a specific topic was being censored.
Unfortunately you didn't offer any evidence that the people opposing this instance of censorship are in favour of censorship in certain circumstances - just a casual assertion that many are. You may well be right, but without proof, it comes across as cantankerous ax-grinding.
You could've said something like "I suspect they're really just doing it to support the gay stuff, but hopefully the library can use the funding to resist all forms of library censorship", and it would've gotten your point across effectively, without seeming churlish about Sonious not writing a fourth line to the title to clarify that a specific topic was being censored.