If she could even say "researching and taking down the terrible convention at least lets me feel like I'm doing something", that article she wrote just feels like she's doing activist journalism. She is doing something right? To be part of this anti-FreeFurAll activist wave? Covering everything only from the perspective of the dominant sentiment in furry fandom?
And checking what she did here with Reuters and AP standards back to back, there's no way her report can be properly attributed to facts other than linking to many tweets *alleging* the furcon of being some right-wing puppet as they portray.
I can only say her post on We Got This Covered is only one side of the story. People should check even more to clarify on more perspectives that exist here.
For the record, Allie Capps, the author of the article on We Got This Covered really gave a hidden agenda vibe.
This social media post she put is how I came up to the conclusion: https://twitter.com/LiteralGrill/status/1433280225224192001?s=20
If she could even say "researching and taking down the terrible convention at least lets me feel like I'm doing something", that article she wrote just feels like she's doing activist journalism. She is doing something right? To be part of this anti-FreeFurAll activist wave? Covering everything only from the perspective of the dominant sentiment in furry fandom?
And checking what she did here with Reuters and AP standards back to back, there's no way her report can be properly attributed to facts other than linking to many tweets *alleging* the furcon of being some right-wing puppet as they portray.
I can only say her post on We Got This Covered is only one side of the story. People should check even more to clarify on more perspectives that exist here.
Oh yeah side note: We Got This Covered has a bad reputation for releasing inaccurate information. You can look at this Google search: https://www.google.com/search?q=we+got+this+covered+reliable&oq=we+got+this+cove...