Oh boy, baby is STILL SALTY ABOUT HAVING GRUDGE ATTACKS POINTED OUT, AND CONTINUING TO PROVE THE POINT YEARS LATER WITH MORE UNSOURCED GRUDGE OUT OF NOWHERE. It's all on record:
(1) His 2015 article about Oklacon is unsourced with a factually incorrect attack: "they had no real relationship with any local community. WikiFur lists Watonga, Oklahoma as the con's home town, but I doubt most Watongans are aware that the con existed." (... he doesn't go to the con...)
(2) Says he "kept them to Reddit instead of the article" but the link shows FALSE. And then he did it again on Reddit and brought up personal grudges at the con himself on my 2015 article that was SOURCED about a relationship with the community. (Local congoer: "…The real victim, ultimately, is Watonga. The chamber of commerce there called it “bigger than Christmas”, amounting to 11% of that town’s annual economy." -- same source also gives him sympathy about his problem.)
(3) After he starts, multiple independent readers point out his grudge bias. (... calls it "shitty con"... doesn't go to con...)
"DUDE! Dafuq?!? Oh yeah, you just established YOUR "journalistic ethics" right there. ... I'll read anything with your name on it with this in mind from now on."
"I don't think you had any reason to write the article with a biased standpoint. From a purely journalistic standpoint, it's unethical."
(4) He picked the fight on Reddit, goes on to attack being too nice to the con and asking to get the facts straight, with hostility to doing research or making calls. Then he admits being "aggressive and angry." SIX months later he brings it up out of the blue on unrelated review of movie he didn't watch to pick a fight again. Then he flips his shit and flounces out as editor because of inability to stop grudging about his mistakes.
APOLOGY TIME! LOL, don't wait for it from the broken record. Just leaving this here to paste from the same old file every time. :)
Sonious' article is a lovely work of perfection by comparison.
Oh boy, baby is STILL SALTY ABOUT HAVING GRUDGE ATTACKS POINTED OUT, AND CONTINUING TO PROVE THE POINT YEARS LATER WITH MORE UNSOURCED GRUDGE OUT OF NOWHERE. It's all on record:
(1) His 2015 article about Oklacon is unsourced with a factually incorrect attack: "they had no real relationship with any local community. WikiFur lists Watonga, Oklahoma as the con's home town, but I doubt most Watongans are aware that the con existed." (... he doesn't go to the con...)
(2) Says he "kept them to Reddit instead of the article" but the link shows FALSE. And then he did it again on Reddit and brought up personal grudges at the con himself on my 2015 article that was SOURCED about a relationship with the community. (Local congoer: "…The real victim, ultimately, is Watonga. The chamber of commerce there called it “bigger than Christmas”, amounting to 11% of that town’s annual economy." -- same source also gives him sympathy about his problem.)
(3) After he starts, multiple independent readers point out his grudge bias. (... calls it "shitty con"... doesn't go to con...)
(4) He picked the fight on Reddit, goes on to attack being too nice to the con and asking to get the facts straight, with hostility to doing research or making calls. Then he admits being "aggressive and angry." SIX months later he brings it up out of the blue on unrelated review of movie he didn't watch to pick a fight again. Then he flips his shit and flounces out as editor because of inability to stop grudging about his mistakes.
APOLOGY TIME! LOL, don't wait for it from the broken record. Just leaving this here to paste from the same old file every time. :)
Sonious' article is a lovely work of perfection by comparison.