thanks for the question! i hope you understand that saying e.g. "one source, [department] lead for [year]," effectively strips a person of their anonymity. maybe you'll forgive me for sounding cagey.
my sources include staffers from a wide range of years. some whose answers supporting my claim were acting staff for 2019, yes.
before someone else asks: generally i tried to chat with folks in relevant roles who ought to have knowledge of things like bans and police reports. con ops, security, executives, etc., with the hope of establishing a pattern.
a shorter, direct reply: some were acting staff and some were former for 2019.
thanks for the question! i hope you understand that saying e.g. "one source, [department] lead for [year]," effectively strips a person of their anonymity. maybe you'll forgive me for sounding cagey.
my sources include staffers from a wide range of years. some whose answers supporting my claim were acting staff for 2019, yes.
before someone else asks: generally i tried to chat with folks in relevant roles who ought to have knowledge of things like bans and police reports. con ops, security, executives, etc., with the hope of establishing a pattern.
a shorter, direct reply: some were acting staff and some were former for 2019.