Hi Patch here. Let's do this again, pointing out all the stupid fucking assumptions from the internet lawyer.
I didn't have millions to defend. The people trying to sue didn't have millions. They had a supposed multi millions project that was trying to get the investor jizz shower. The main victim served a $58 million lawsuit to the villain at dinner with the investors. You appear to have no clue about what damages are.
Many factors go in to a dispute besides money. You don't know those factors. Only an idiot tries to sum them up ahead of time. Lawyers don't do what you think you can do here. You're not a lawyer and need to put that in front of every stupid post you make.
Qutens didn't state anything about poverty. Only that a fund was open to take donations. That amount might pay for a week of lawyer hours. Do the math vs DHC's potential resources (which you don't know) for taking in that much every month or two.
Not all lawsuits hinge on financial incentive. Proving someone lied and forcing retractions, spite or frivolous actions are things. You also don't know how many defendants there could be or what assets they have.
Intentional torts can not be discharged in bankruptcy.
"nowhere in the text of that document is 'DHC' mentioned" oh sweet summer child.
Did you mean to talk about statutory limits? You don't have the bare minimum info do you.
Hi Patch here. Let's do this again, pointing out all the stupid fucking assumptions from the internet lawyer.
I didn't have millions to defend. The people trying to sue didn't have millions. They had a supposed multi millions project that was trying to get the investor jizz shower. The main victim served a $58 million lawsuit to the villain at dinner with the investors. You appear to have no clue about what damages are.
Many factors go in to a dispute besides money. You don't know those factors. Only an idiot tries to sum them up ahead of time. Lawyers don't do what you think you can do here. You're not a lawyer and need to put that in front of every stupid post you make.
Qutens didn't state anything about poverty. Only that a fund was open to take donations. That amount might pay for a week of lawyer hours. Do the math vs DHC's potential resources (which you don't know) for taking in that much every month or two.
Not all lawsuits hinge on financial incentive. Proving someone lied and forcing retractions, spite or frivolous actions are things. You also don't know how many defendants there could be or what assets they have.
Intentional torts can not be discharged in bankruptcy.
"nowhere in the text of that document is 'DHC' mentioned" oh sweet summer child.
Did you mean to talk about statutory limits? You don't have the bare minimum info do you.