While there is no text of "Don't Hug Cacti" there are two photos in the document that are contain their company name.
Page 64 and 27.
The one on 64 can be tied with the evidence of her parrot, but the one on page 27 has no ties with any of the surrounding text I can discern. If the goal of Qutens was to make sure DHC as a company was not brought in under the testimony, those two images were an oversite and could be an inlet.
The economic unviability was something Lucky did note in her video statement. Though if she had no intent to go through with it, then why send a C&D?
Perhaps it was to do a SLAP, but this seems to have failed as Qutens was able to raise defense funding. Now the question is if Lucky believed if she's damned if she does and damned if she doesn't how much revenge is worth it to her? People don't always make decisions based on sound economical considerations.
(Of which I learned about the whole FurAffinity:United mis-statement I did.)
While there is no text of "Don't Hug Cacti" there are two photos in the document that are contain their company name.
Page 64 and 27.
The one on 64 can be tied with the evidence of her parrot, but the one on page 27 has no ties with any of the surrounding text I can discern. If the goal of Qutens was to make sure DHC as a company was not brought in under the testimony, those two images were an oversite and could be an inlet.
The economic unviability was something Lucky did note in her video statement. Though if she had no intent to go through with it, then why send a C&D?
Perhaps it was to do a SLAP, but this seems to have failed as Qutens was able to raise defense funding. Now the question is if Lucky believed if she's damned if she does and damned if she doesn't how much revenge is worth it to her? People don't always make decisions based on sound economical considerations.
(Of which I learned about the whole FurAffinity:United mis-statement I did.)