It may be that a lot of people got used to seeing reviews and longer articles and commentaries in Fuzzy Logic back when it was being produced, and never really adjusted to the transition from Cornwuff/Fuzzy Logic to Flayrah. I assume the idea was that on Flayrah these reviews and longer articles could be posted as soon as they were received and went through the editorial review process instead of having to wait months to appear in the next Fuzzy Logic. (I can think of at least one review I had been looking forward to reading that had purportedly been submitted and slated to appear in the next Fuzzy Logic (it was for "Redeeming Factors" by James R. Lane). I've still never seen the review.)
Aside from Fuzzy Logic, Flayrah has done everything much better that the old Cornwuff website did, with more options and more features. But when it comes to reviews and the more in-depth articles that appeared in Fuzzy Logic, Flayrah hasn't done so well (and again this may be due not so much to any fault on the part of Flayrah as to a lack of communication and/or failure of would-be authors to adjust). I've even seen a couple of websites with links to Fuzzy Logic that, as they put it, mourn the demise of this excellent e-zine. So I guess the question becomes, how can Flayrah better fill the shoes of Fuzzy Logic? I'll leave it to Aureth to remark on whether reviving Fuzzy Logic is an option, but Flayrah has some features we never had on Fuzzy Logic that would be nice to have, such as the ability to post comments on the reviews and articles (for that matter, does that capability exist even now in Flayrah's reviews section?).
It may be that a lot of people got used to seeing reviews and longer articles and commentaries in Fuzzy Logic back when it was being produced, and never really adjusted to the transition from Cornwuff/Fuzzy Logic to Flayrah. I assume the idea was that on Flayrah these reviews and longer articles could be posted as soon as they were received and went through the editorial review process instead of having to wait months to appear in the next Fuzzy Logic. (I can think of at least one review I had been looking forward to reading that had purportedly been submitted and slated to appear in the next Fuzzy Logic (it was for "Redeeming Factors" by James R. Lane). I've still never seen the review.)
Aside from Fuzzy Logic, Flayrah has done everything much better that the old Cornwuff website did, with more options and more features. But when it comes to reviews and the more in-depth articles that appeared in Fuzzy Logic, Flayrah hasn't done so well (and again this may be due not so much to any fault on the part of Flayrah as to a lack of communication and/or failure of would-be authors to adjust). I've even seen a couple of websites with links to Fuzzy Logic that, as they put it, mourn the demise of this excellent e-zine. So I guess the question becomes, how can Flayrah better fill the shoes of Fuzzy Logic? I'll leave it to Aureth to remark on whether reviving Fuzzy Logic is an option, but Flayrah has some features we never had on Fuzzy Logic that would be nice to have, such as the ability to post comments on the reviews and articles (for that matter, does that capability exist even now in Flayrah's reviews section?).
mwalimu