I'm gonna have to disagree. If the furry "fandom" isn't creative or original, then creativity and originality doesn't exist, considering every creation comes from somewhere.
There just isn't a difference between the creation of the western dragon, and a fursona with large emotional eyes with a mix of colors. I mean their both based off existing past. Terms "fandom" and "copyright" doesn't change anything.
Of course, if creativity does exist, then it's about combining existing ideas thus applying to a lot of fursonas today. Even if the art style was just like Disney (even though it's hard to tell if an art style can be copyrighted).
I'm gonna have to disagree. If the furry "fandom" isn't creative or original, then creativity and originality doesn't exist, considering every creation comes from somewhere.
There just isn't a difference between the creation of the western dragon, and a fursona with large emotional eyes with a mix of colors. I mean their both based off existing past. Terms "fandom" and "copyright" doesn't change anything.
Of course, if creativity does exist, then it's about combining existing ideas thus applying to a lot of fursonas today. Even if the art style was just like Disney (even though it's hard to tell if an art style can be copyrighted).