Your quoted sentence suggests Grubbs is confused about FC's policy because, unless there is something else not mentioned in this article, it doesn't cover all of those crimes.
"Now, in the case of FC's policy, we are discussing violent criminal records, such as murder, rape, and pedophilia."
vs
"AAE and FurCon do not permit membership or attendance by any individual who is a convicted sex offender, or appears on any federal or state sex offender registry. In addition, AAE and FurCon reserve the right, at the board’s discretion, to deny membership or attendance to anyone with a documented history of sexual violence, including inappropriate conduct towards minors."
I was just looking for some quick example links. At the moment, the Flayrah comment sections have a lot of anons with varying, though usually poor, ability to follow arguments, so it seemed good to have some external support. The first link does deal with the same case as the second but it also discusses the issue in a wider form.
"If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind."
~John Stuart Mill~
Your quoted sentence suggests Grubbs is confused about FC's policy because, unless there is something else not mentioned in this article, it doesn't cover all of those crimes.
"Now, in the case of FC's policy, we are discussing violent criminal records, such as murder, rape, and pedophilia."
vs
"AAE and FurCon do not permit membership or attendance by any individual who is a convicted sex offender, or appears on any federal or state sex offender registry. In addition, AAE and FurCon reserve the right, at the board’s discretion, to deny membership or attendance to anyone with a documented history of sexual violence, including inappropriate conduct towards minors."
I was just looking for some quick example links. At the moment, the Flayrah comment sections have a lot of anons with varying, though usually poor, ability to follow arguments, so it seemed good to have some external support. The first link does deal with the same case as the second but it also discusses the issue in a wider form.
"If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind."
~John Stuart Mill~