Not too sure but I like that this person is likely not one of those people who ban people regardless of heart, and instead maybe, depends on the current heart of some other people.
And if there isn't a threat to anyone at the convention, I don't see much of a reason to ban the person if there is no effect from the person being there.
Even in the case of "victims at the place" even though I have my thoughts on that, it's not like any non-human animals are there. If one were to ban someone just for being abusive to non-human animals outside, it would be like banning someone for getting a speeding ticket; unrelated to anything at the furcon likely.
Though would I ban someone who still abuses animals illegally? I mean, I probably would because maybe I should rather report such cruelty to the government of the country. And would I ban someone if I feel that they have a huge risk toward the furcon? Likely so.
Other than that, I don't see any moral reason to do something that has no good value gained.
I speak this probably in behalf of most people today. A lot of people these days might have caused abuse (usually small) today, but that doesn't mean they should be banned in any legal place having no connection to it with low risk, or else that might happen to most people today. XD
But if someone is breaking the law while at the place, that might be a different story.
Not too sure but I like that this person is likely not one of those people who ban people regardless of heart, and instead maybe, depends on the current heart of some other people.
And if there isn't a threat to anyone at the convention, I don't see much of a reason to ban the person if there is no effect from the person being there.
Even in the case of "victims at the place" even though I have my thoughts on that, it's not like any non-human animals are there. If one were to ban someone just for being abusive to non-human animals outside, it would be like banning someone for getting a speeding ticket; unrelated to anything at the furcon likely.
Though would I ban someone who still abuses animals illegally? I mean, I probably would because maybe I should rather report such cruelty to the government of the country. And would I ban someone if I feel that they have a huge risk toward the furcon? Likely so.
Other than that, I don't see any moral reason to do something that has no good value gained.
I speak this probably in behalf of most people today. A lot of people these days might have caused abuse (usually small) today, but that doesn't mean they should be banned in any legal place having no connection to it with low risk, or else that might happen to most people today. XD
But if someone is breaking the law while at the place, that might be a different story.
My thoughts.
Sorry if I made a mistake or more.