You have no right to say what 2cross2affliction said is a "fact". Just because you want it to, doesn't make it so.
I assume it's more civil law. If what 2cross2affliction did reaches all elements of a prohibited crime, then I might be able to be free to sue such person and maybe even the site. I am not sure if I'm gonna actually bother if what he does allows me to sue legally, but I can however expose it in the public legally as a victim of it.
The rating and anti-spam rule isn't moral alone. And losing what? The ability to mark comments as spam? Not a really big deal to me. If the owner of the website wants to do that to someone who sincerely wanted to use it for the purpose of hiding something that creates a "demand" of harming an actual person, that's likely his only fault and it certainly won't stop me from standing up toward it. Even if somehow, what, my logged in version of an account gets banned on here?
This time, if I do rate my own comments, I would likely rate to my comments that fight against false information in order to not be folded (a form of censorship) and I would likely not bother telling. XD Note: I didn't say that I would.
Kind of funny to see most members adopt to something that probably doesn't have so much evidence, yet ignores the evidence of harm of things they do support. Many here can't even understand how life works either. Kinda funny.
You have no right to say what 2cross2affliction said is a "fact". Just because you want it to, doesn't make it so.
I assume it's more civil law. If what 2cross2affliction did reaches all elements of a prohibited crime, then I might be able to be free to sue such person and maybe even the site. I am not sure if I'm gonna actually bother if what he does allows me to sue legally, but I can however expose it in the public legally as a victim of it.
The rating and anti-spam rule isn't moral alone. And losing what? The ability to mark comments as spam? Not a really big deal to me. If the owner of the website wants to do that to someone who sincerely wanted to use it for the purpose of hiding something that creates a "demand" of harming an actual person, that's likely his only fault and it certainly won't stop me from standing up toward it. Even if somehow, what, my logged in version of an account gets banned on here?
This time, if I do rate my own comments, I would likely rate to my comments that fight against false information in order to not be folded (a form of censorship) and I would likely not bother telling. XD Note: I didn't say that I would.
Also gonna leave this comment.
Kind of funny to see most members adopt to something that probably doesn't have so much evidence, yet ignores the evidence of harm of things they do support. Many here can't even understand how life works either. Kinda funny.
Account abandoned and probably will make a new anonymous account with no trace of evidence of it being me. I think it's justified.