Ah thanks. So that's a legal referencing convention. That does rather seem like there's not really any studies backing up their claims then. I'd have to go back to check but really all they had were statements from people. I suppose legal precedent is usually set by opinions but coming from science, that is not a reliable way to establish truth.
"If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind."
~John Stuart Mill~
Ah thanks. So that's a legal referencing convention. That does rather seem like there's not really any studies backing up their claims then. I'd have to go back to check but really all they had were statements from people. I suppose legal precedent is usually set by opinions but coming from science, that is not a reliable way to establish truth.
"If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind."
~John Stuart Mill~