I've already addressed the "demand" thing. Second you're talking about "distributing", I thought we were more focused on "possession"?
"revictimizing" the victim? Why do you believe in what might be voodoo theory?
I mean, what if the victim isn't a child anymore?
What if the victim died from cancer before possession? Is the victim in the dead damaged?
And even then, is a child miles away without knowledge of such thing "damaged"?
Even if what you claim is the reason, that doesn't make it a logical scientific reason. Where is the concrete evidence that possession is the same as literally "demanding" them by default.
I think people should not possess it, but I will never agree to the idea that mere possession "just as bad as making it" alone unless that type of behavior does.
I've already addressed the "demand" thing. Second you're talking about "distributing", I thought we were more focused on "possession"?
"revictimizing" the victim? Why do you believe in what might be voodoo theory?
I mean, what if the victim isn't a child anymore?
What if the victim died from cancer before possession? Is the victim in the dead damaged?
And even then, is a child miles away without knowledge of such thing "damaged"?
Even if what you claim is the reason, that doesn't make it a logical scientific reason. Where is the concrete evidence that possession is the same as literally "demanding" them by default.
I think people should not possess it, but I will never agree to the idea that mere possession "just as bad as making it" alone unless that type of behavior does.
Account abandoned and probably will make a new anonymous account with no trace of evidence of it being me. I think it's justified.