I already mentioned that mere possession alone should not be compared to someone who actually makes it, you can read one comment here: https://www.flayrah.com/7480/toast-rabbit-aka-rainhopper-roo-sentenced-70-months...
I consider the actual making of the image to be more serious than merely possessing certain images alone. I fully understand the situation likely.
That's fucking bullshit partly. It doesn't change the fact that if a criminal thought of making more just because someone else possessed it, it's 100% the criminal's fault. If I agreed with you, the same must be said for having certain fictional porn, having legal traffic, and legal cities for example that don't directly demand it.
If someone directly asked someone to make it, that's a whole different story. Both people in one example are directly responsible.
Some of your behavior remind me of that person in UK trying to prove that child sex dolls "increase" child sexual abuse because someone who hurt actual children had a possession of one or maybe more, which isn't really proof because not having such doll is likely not gonna cure the person for example.
Not all pedophiles who possess are gonna go in and share the pictures. There is no concrete proof either. And not everyone who possessed such certain pictures are podophiles.
PTSD not being cured, proof? And even if not, it's likely that it doesn't stop the person from enjoying most of life.
If you have any reality, you would understand how moral blame works.
There is a reason why I'm against "mere possession is as bad as making it!" it can cause people to support cruel and unusual punishment for example. Edit after one rating, feel like I wanted to be maybe more clear. Edit Done.
Someone possessing a picture found on a the dark streets are not gonna ask for someone to make more by default unless that person does. Some people will control their own boundaries, and the person who wants to make more has their own fault. And anyone who directly helped someone make one are both at fault for example.
I wouldn't be damn surprised that you wish the death penalty was legal for Toast or LWOP was legal for such person. Both are a million times worse than what Toast did. Either of those are even worse than mere child molestation itself too.
Even then, if I did agree that it should be illegal in one way because of some very risk thing, then make it a separate penalty then if it's a very risk thing, but not as bad as the direct make because the lack of intention may still exist sometimes and mere possession isn't the same as directly asking someone to make it, nor is it the same as going to cause any harm alone morally, not sure on law.
Though I do believe in dropping charges though. Especially if the person did not want to hurt someone in the future.
I already mentioned that mere possession alone should not be compared to someone who actually makes it, you can read one comment here: https://www.flayrah.com/7480/toast-rabbit-aka-rainhopper-roo-sentenced-70-months...
I consider the actual making of the image to be more serious than merely possessing certain images alone. I fully understand the situation likely.
That's fucking bullshit partly. It doesn't change the fact that if a criminal thought of making more just because someone else possessed it, it's 100% the criminal's fault. If I agreed with you, the same must be said for having certain fictional porn, having legal traffic, and legal cities for example that don't directly demand it.
If someone directly asked someone to make it, that's a whole different story. Both people in one example are directly responsible.
Some of your behavior remind me of that person in UK trying to prove that child sex dolls "increase" child sexual abuse because someone who hurt actual children had a possession of one or maybe more, which isn't really proof because not having such doll is likely not gonna cure the person for example.
Not all pedophiles who possess are gonna go in and share the pictures. There is no concrete proof either. And not everyone who possessed such certain pictures are podophiles.
PTSD not being cured, proof? And even if not, it's likely that it doesn't stop the person from enjoying most of life.
If you have any reality, you would understand how moral blame works.
There is a reason why I'm against "mere possession is as bad as making it!" it can cause people to support cruel and unusual punishment for example. Edit after one rating, feel like I wanted to be maybe more clear. Edit Done.
Someone possessing a picture found on a the dark streets are not gonna ask for someone to make more by default unless that person does. Some people will control their own boundaries, and the person who wants to make more has their own fault. And anyone who directly helped someone make one are both at fault for example.
I wouldn't be damn surprised that you wish the death penalty was legal for Toast or LWOP was legal for such person. Both are a million times worse than what Toast did. Either of those are even worse than mere child molestation itself too.
Even then, if I did agree that it should be illegal in one way because of some very risk thing, then make it a separate penalty then if it's a very risk thing, but not as bad as the direct make because the lack of intention may still exist sometimes and mere possession isn't the same as directly asking someone to make it, nor is it the same as going to cause any harm alone morally, not sure on law.
Though I do believe in dropping charges though. Especially if the person did not want to hurt someone in the future.
________________
Links to moral blame general articles that involves criminal responsibility I think. Not a lawyer. Just in case, respect the law. I am not too sure on my arguments. Morally I more believe.
Account abandoned and probably will make a new anonymous account with no trace of evidence of it being me. I think it's justified.