Creative Commons license icon

Reply to comment

Don't give me that "demand" bullshit to mere possession. That's like saying "traffic" causes a demand of many certain crimes. Or that "guns" creates a demand of certain crimes, and/or some more.
Mere possession of certain illegal images should never, EVER be compared to those that makes certain pictures and/or intentionally aids it. Even if it was the same, lifetime registry is 100% too far still.
And while I'm not so sure, many laws likely don't even act like possession is the same as making it even though it's still against the law.

Because it's possible a person possessing the picture had no intention in a case of mere possession, it should not be compared in a non-legal argument sense. Otherwise, let's legalize the death penalty for most things legal today because some people use it for horrible things. It's the same exact logic for certain images morally speaking.

Disclaimer: Probably already said this. I am not giving a legal argument I hope. I'm no lawyer, and respect the law. Make sure what you want to do is legal. Sorry if I made a mistake or more on this.

Reply

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <img> <b> <i> <s> <blockquote> <ul> <ol> <li> <table> <tr> <td> <th> <sub> <sup> <object> <embed> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <dl> <dt> <dd> <param> <center> <strong> <q> <cite> <code> <em>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This test is to prevent automated spam submissions.
Leave empty.