Creative Commons license icon

Reply to comment

I... guess I'll take that as a complement. It's a bit weird though because to even entertain the thought that I might be a Nazi would mean to ignore basically everything I've ever said and written since pretty much every one of my positions is completely opposite to those in Nazism. Why you wouldn't use that as your reason is quite odd.

I'm not too worried about what Obama is saying but nothing I said had anything to do with whether Nazis are bad or not. Sure, Nazis are bad. That's self-evident to 99% of furs. But the questions raised here are concerned with approaches to political issues at conventions and the importance of correct definitions.

I know next to nothing about Discordian Dragon. The only part that was relevant here was the comic. That stands alone regardless of any of his other views, to think otherwise would fall into the genetic fallacy. If the other comic reflects a good message then why would I care about the rest. As Seneca said, “I’ll quote a bad author if the line is good.”

"If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind."
~John Stuart Mill~

Reply

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <img> <b> <i> <s> <blockquote> <ul> <ol> <li> <table> <tr> <td> <th> <sub> <sup> <object> <embed> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <dl> <dt> <dd> <param> <center> <strong> <q> <cite> <code> <em>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This test is to prevent automated spam submissions.
Leave empty.