Creative Commons license icon

Reply to comment

You and I both know that's not true, because you repeated a twisted story without bothering to check in a 2016 video, so I sent you a confidential, extensively linked and quoted, with timeline, correction. Still archived in my email from Aug 8 2016.

This story about "the Oklacon thing" is based on a grudge I have nothing to do with. I didn't discuss Oklacon 6 months later when it was made an issue by the source *because the source was repeating the same mistake of bashing a movie and/or event they didn't watch or attend, and I questioned bashing a movie without watching it.*

The grudge from 6 months earlier was brought up by the source of the grudge, in this sequence:

A) Source (in public comments on a public story): "I have a grudge about the event in the story I wrote, even though I don't attend" - "it makes me aggressive and angry"

B) Me (and many others including attendees:) "Please disclose in the story if you're bashing an event based on a grudge, it's not fair to people who attend, they did nothing wrong."

C) "How dare you harass me by mentioning this grudge".

D) Sonious (listening to source 6 months later): "Patch is harassing the source".

Not fair dude. Everyone has biases good or bad, A) can be fixed, B) isn't assholism, C) is where it goes off the rails, and D) is just not true.

Reply

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <img> <b> <i> <s> <blockquote> <ul> <ol> <li> <table> <tr> <td> <th> <sub> <sup> <object> <embed> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <dl> <dt> <dd> <param> <center> <strong> <q> <cite> <code> <em>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This test is to prevent automated spam submissions.
Leave empty.