The issue is that Ockham's razor indicates to me that the whole tax thing was not in order. Particularly since there were Sovereign Citizens at the helm of convention legal decisions.
If that is true (as evidenced by the letter to Deo it seems to be so), then the odds of them having the knowledge and knowhow to retain non-profit status in the bureaucratic means instead of making stuff up as they went along and it ended up biting them in the end sort is a very likely possibility.
Are the sources that tell you otherwise the Sov Cits? Because they believe they're right in most things simply because they see the way they perceive the law as accurate by default.
The issue is that Ockham's razor indicates to me that the whole tax thing was not in order. Particularly since there were Sovereign Citizens at the helm of convention legal decisions.
If that is true (as evidenced by the letter to Deo it seems to be so), then the odds of them having the knowledge and knowhow to retain non-profit status in the bureaucratic means instead of making stuff up as they went along and it ended up biting them in the end sort is a very likely possibility.
Are the sources that tell you otherwise the Sov Cits? Because they believe they're right in most things simply because they see the way they perceive the law as accurate by default.
In the words of Regan, "Trust, but verify."