I'm not too surprised that the BLFC stat was incorrect. When I was writing it, it seemed unlikely to me that it could have held that record for so long.
I could have used other methods to try and find out if the stat was correct, but I figured if it was wrong someone would comment that it was wrong pretty quickly and it could be corrected at that time. It'd be the quickest method to get that data.
I'm not too surprised that the BLFC stat was incorrect. When I was writing it, it seemed unlikely to me that it could have held that record for so long.
I could have used other methods to try and find out if the stat was correct, but I figured if it was wrong someone would comment that it was wrong pretty quickly and it could be corrected at that time. It'd be the quickest method to get that data.
Thanks for the correction!