As Fred does note, Dog Patch did do coverage on that particular issue. I didn't witness anything in regards to the arrest, though I was aware of it, so I do not have much to add in that regard. I also know that Dogpatch would probably cover it given it's something people would give Patch more information in regards to and it's more his style of things to cover.
Me excluding them from this article was a choice because of the items outlined above, including it would have not fit in with the flow of the story I was trying to produce. I could have made a second article, but to be frank I've been working 11-12 hour shifts since MFF because this time of year is crunch time (I'm only writing this now because our corporate intranet is malfunctioning... which doesn't help matters). So if I know someone else will cover it, and that it will detract from the narrative of the story being placed then it's best to leave that coverage to others.
If you wish to cover it, you may. If people want to read it there, they may. I'm too busy to really lose sleep that everyone is not getting 100% of their information from me.
There is also the relevance thing, because there is also the Fox/Service dog issue that popped up, but that I felt was an in the moment issue that a year from now would be ultimately forgotten with time. In fact it's already kind of run its course through the internet adrenal system and has been forgotten mostly at this point by few except nerds (such as myself). Personally I didn't see the fox, so I didn't have much to add there either.
As Fred does note, Dog Patch did do coverage on that particular issue. I didn't witness anything in regards to the arrest, though I was aware of it, so I do not have much to add in that regard. I also know that Dogpatch would probably cover it given it's something people would give Patch more information in regards to and it's more his style of things to cover.
Me excluding them from this article was a choice because of the items outlined above, including it would have not fit in with the flow of the story I was trying to produce. I could have made a second article, but to be frank I've been working 11-12 hour shifts since MFF because this time of year is crunch time (I'm only writing this now because our corporate intranet is malfunctioning... which doesn't help matters). So if I know someone else will cover it, and that it will detract from the narrative of the story being placed then it's best to leave that coverage to others.
If you wish to cover it, you may. If people want to read it there, they may. I'm too busy to really lose sleep that everyone is not getting 100% of their information from me.
There is also the relevance thing, because there is also the Fox/Service dog issue that popped up, but that I felt was an in the moment issue that a year from now would be ultimately forgotten with time. In fact it's already kind of run its course through the internet adrenal system and has been forgotten mostly at this point by few except nerds (such as myself). Personally I didn't see the fox, so I didn't have much to add there either.