Thanks for sharing your perspective on the situation.
As far as the attendance numbers, I would have to double check, but it may indeed be the largest first con which is indeed news worthy. It is a regret that I didn't wait on the number (though I did, it just was never put up on its social media page by the time I had pushed to publish, but that was my decision).
I do think I will update the main story to reflect that once I double check the numbers to ensure it is the largest first year con, but it does sound about right.
I think that at the end of the day, Seattle did need a furry convention revival (even in the religious sense).
Glad you enjoyed yourself.
Also, congrats on your first comment after being a user for 2 years :)
Thanks for sharing your perspective on the situation.
As far as the attendance numbers, I would have to double check, but it may indeed be the largest first con which is indeed news worthy. It is a regret that I didn't wait on the number (though I did, it just was never put up on its social media page by the time I had pushed to publish, but that was my decision).
I do think I will update the main story to reflect that once I double check the numbers to ensure it is the largest first year con, but it does sound about right.
I think that at the end of the day, Seattle did need a furry convention revival (even in the religious sense).
Glad you enjoyed yourself.
Also, congrats on your first comment after being a user for 2 years :)