LOL, I've been careful to separate valid criticism and the "insanely insane amount of rumor and conjecture-based bashing on Twitter". If people who aren't even going to the con demand transparent operation and then send harshly reactive paranoia when they don't get it, something's not right. With the con, or the people?
I'm not sure that Lisa has a right to expect the convention would announce her presence, especially when NDA's are a thing and objectivity seems to be desired.
Transparency is not a be-all end-all goal. There's investigating but there's also plain lack of boundaries. Saying that isn't QBing about your article, like if the chair hasn't been asked about it, I'm not expecting yours to, I can do it. That's how Being The Media is better with multiple sites. :)
LOL, I've been careful to separate valid criticism and the "insanely insane amount of rumor and conjecture-based bashing on Twitter". If people who aren't even going to the con demand transparent operation and then send harshly reactive paranoia when they don't get it, something's not right. With the con, or the people?
I'm not sure that Lisa has a right to expect the convention would announce her presence, especially when NDA's are a thing and objectivity seems to be desired.
Transparency is not a be-all end-all goal. There's investigating but there's also plain lack of boundaries. Saying that isn't QBing about your article, like if the chair hasn't been asked about it, I'm not expecting yours to, I can do it. That's how Being The Media is better with multiple sites. :)