I noticed that when I was reading a few of Anthrocon's pages last night looking for references for an article on WikiFur, the plagiarized phraseology. That's hot, right? That's what we want with our "anthropomorphic" art? Plagiarism?
I wonder if anyone behind the convention is reading this right now. Somebody was savvy enough to create a WikiFur account and write an article about the convention back in May, and they later went on to edit the Aquatifur article when they discovered a broken link. Someone knows more than it might seem looking at the biographies. Or maybe they're really, really into learning about the fandom and other conventions to make a good impression. I like that idea.
If any Anthro NW staff is reading this, I'd love to chat.
I noticed that when I was reading a few of Anthrocon's pages last night looking for references for an article on WikiFur, the plagiarized phraseology. That's hot, right? That's what we want with our "anthropomorphic" art? Plagiarism?
I wonder if anyone behind the convention is reading this right now. Somebody was savvy enough to create a WikiFur account and write an article about the convention back in May, and they later went on to edit the Aquatifur article when they discovered a broken link. Someone knows more than it might seem looking at the biographies. Or maybe they're really, really into learning about the fandom and other conventions to make a good impression. I like that idea.
If any Anthro NW staff is reading this, I'd love to chat.