What are the problems?
"There are philosophers that argue that there can be meaningful consent from animals. There are also ethicists focussed on animal rights who also don't find a problem with bestiality." Is that what you're saying is the problem or is that just basic research? But I might agree to some of those theories. If it looks like the non-human animal consented, then that could be a similar argument to a human having sex but without words. Some humans cannot speak also but not sure if that's still considered consent.
I think I agree with you on that. As someone who argues popular beliefs involving this taboo subject, that type of behavior from some people are so hypocritical or at least it feels like it in case they believe it's wrong to have sex with non-human animals for any reason or more outside of the consent argument.
What are the problems?
"There are philosophers that argue that there can be meaningful consent from animals. There are also ethicists focussed on animal rights who also don't find a problem with bestiality."
Is that what you're saying is the problem or is that just basic research? But I might agree to some of those theories. If it looks like the non-human animal consented, then that could be a similar argument to a human having sex but without words. Some humans cannot speak also but not sure if that's still considered consent.
I think I agree with you on that. As someone who argues popular beliefs involving this taboo subject, that type of behavior from some people are so hypocritical or at least it feels like it in case they believe it's wrong to have sex with non-human animals for any reason or more outside of the consent argument.