How the hell do those movies give "standards" and Alpha and Omega doesn't? I think you might just be making up bullshit as hard as you can because you don't want to admit how stupid you are.
Well the argument was "uhhh, that Alpha and Omega story feels too similar", so that's why I compared the growing up thing because the "similar" thing was the subject here.
Yes, it is. Every character in art may have a different or inspired design so more people can enjoy it. Many arts have different legal styles and that's great, even if it's not everyone's interest.
Just growing with more people liking it as the goal means the not liking behavior doesn't matter to the creator.
If a the plot is meant to be for those who didn't see it, or meant for those who likes stories like that, or both... then the idea of those audiences liking that is the goal maybe. We've seen a lot of people enjoy the plot that way, and many who didn't see the other similar elements may like it.
Umm, no. Popular opinion as "proof" because it's popular is an automatic fail argument for this type of subject. So I ask again, where is the actual relevant proof that the movie is "bad"?
I already argued how the movie is probably good for what it is.
I think it's easily assume some old movies are terrible, and it's just that it's terrible for what it's trying to be. It's easy to research I think.
There is nothing wrong with characters like Kate, and Humphrey being there. But I can still be less bias, and for example that Alpha and Omega DS game sucks as a game. All I can say is that at least you can collect it I guess.
Skipping first.
How the hell do those movies give "standards" and Alpha and Omega doesn't? I think you might just be making up bullshit as hard as you can because you don't want to admit how stupid you are.
Well the argument was "uhhh, that Alpha and Omega story feels too similar", so that's why I compared the growing up thing because the "similar" thing was the subject here.
Yes, it is. Every character in art may have a different or inspired design so more people can enjoy it. Many arts have different legal styles and that's great, even if it's not everyone's interest.
Just growing with more people liking it as the goal means the not liking behavior doesn't matter to the creator.
If a the plot is meant to be for those who didn't see it, or meant for those who likes stories like that, or both... then the idea of those audiences liking that is the goal maybe. We've seen a lot of people enjoy the plot that way, and many who didn't see the other similar elements may like it.
Umm, no. Popular opinion as "proof" because it's popular is an automatic fail argument for this type of subject. So I ask again, where is the actual relevant proof that the movie is "bad"?
I already argued how the movie is probably good for what it is.
I think it's easily assume some old movies are terrible, and it's just that it's terrible for what it's trying to be. It's easy to research I think.
There is nothing wrong with characters like Kate, and Humphrey being there. But I can still be less bias, and for example that Alpha and Omega DS game sucks as a game. All I can say is that at least you can collect it I guess.