I think I was saying the evidence of consent just to say it's there too. Of course I still argue anthropomorphic wolves shouldn't be compared to be on the same level.
Even if some are defending it after they had sex with a full non-human animal, that doesn't mean their arguments are automatically invalid. Evidence can still be evidence.
If for example, a goat went behind a human and directly tried to have sex with the human, then that's evidence. If such event happened, then it must be concrete proof. It would prove THAT animal consented.
That type of debate of evidence is what I'm open about.
That certain porn, the only "consent" argument I might have is self pictures without force and/or based off perverted asking. Though I need to do more research I guess.
Consent is the main argument for taboo relationships that are clearly consensual. Before anyone thinks, I argue children cannot consent to sex. Also a child saying "yes" is not evidence.
I think I was saying the evidence of consent just to say it's there too. Of course I still argue anthropomorphic wolves shouldn't be compared to be on the same level.
Even if some are defending it after they had sex with a full non-human animal, that doesn't mean their arguments are automatically invalid. Evidence can still be evidence.
If for example, a goat went behind a human and directly tried to have sex with the human, then that's evidence. If such event happened, then it must be concrete proof. It would prove THAT animal consented.
That type of debate of evidence is what I'm open about.
That certain porn, the only "consent" argument I might have is self pictures without force and/or based off perverted asking. Though I need to do more research I guess.
Consent is the main argument for taboo relationships that are clearly consensual. Before anyone thinks, I argue children cannot consent to sex. Also a child saying "yes" is not evidence.