I already explained why the movie is either: just as good or close, or all is bad.
Anyone who couldn't have fun with the story of the movie because "they've seen similar" is someone who grew up differently. And those who never seen such story, and saw the Alpha and Omega one first, would like it. All is bias. That's why it's more of the same unless somehow Alpha and Omega had some legit problem outside the story.
I think I was trying to say sorry if I'm wrong to assume you wanted to change any concept by "adding" more.
You can actually be more objective in a critique. Depending on a score like that isn't not good. I also went in to see some arguments why some critics didn't like it, but some were really unfair. I remember one complaint about the designs of the characters even though it's just a design, like any Zootopia character.
I said that the rating isn't a bad score because it looked like you were using that as if it was. I wasn't saying that the score tells an answer of the quality.
Can you prove that it's "stupid"?
I already explained why the movie is either: just as good or close, or all is bad.
Anyone who couldn't have fun with the story of the movie because "they've seen similar" is someone who grew up differently. And those who never seen such story, and saw the Alpha and Omega one first, would like it. All is bias. That's why it's more of the same unless somehow Alpha and Omega had some legit problem outside the story.
I think I was trying to say sorry if I'm wrong to assume you wanted to change any concept by "adding" more.
You can actually be more objective in a critique. Depending on a score like that isn't not good. I also went in to see some arguments why some critics didn't like it, but some were really unfair. I remember one complaint about the designs of the characters even though it's just a design, like any Zootopia character.
I said that the rating isn't a bad score because it looked like you were using that as if it was. I wasn't saying that the score tells an answer of the quality.