"Because it's as good as any old Disney movie."
No it is not, and it never will be. The Disney classics will CONTINUE to be classics for generations to come. The love that you feel for this movie will die out with YOU.
"Plus the characters are enjoyable, and inspiring."
Interesting theory, considering how the sequels only did LESS AND LESS with these characters. Inspiring indeed...
"The only thing I can say is that the movie could of been even better by adding more."
I whole-heartedly agree. More jokes that actually WORK, more twists and turns so the plot is less predictable, more chemistry between our main characters, more attention to environmental physics, more focus into whether or not the world should be more serious or cartoonish... Since we're both in agreement that SO MUCH MORE could be added to make it less terrible, why are we even at odds here?
"I still need proof of your side."
iMDB audience scores, Rotten Tomatoes scores, video reviews, written reviews, box office receipts, comments and forum posts... These are the only things which can create anything close to a "measurement" of quality for any movie. The problem is you've already preemptively dismissed them without offering any sort of alternative of what could BETTER represent the quality of a movie than peoples' reaction to it, so all you're doing is sabotaging yourself. But WE'RE the closed-minded ones, aren't we? -_-
"Because it's as good as any old Disney movie."
No it is not, and it never will be. The Disney classics will CONTINUE to be classics for generations to come. The love that you feel for this movie will die out with YOU.
"Plus the characters are enjoyable, and inspiring."
Interesting theory, considering how the sequels only did LESS AND LESS with these characters. Inspiring indeed...
"The only thing I can say is that the movie could of been even better by adding more."
I whole-heartedly agree. More jokes that actually WORK, more twists and turns so the plot is less predictable, more chemistry between our main characters, more attention to environmental physics, more focus into whether or not the world should be more serious or cartoonish... Since we're both in agreement that SO MUCH MORE could be added to make it less terrible, why are we even at odds here?
"I still need proof of your side."
iMDB audience scores, Rotten Tomatoes scores, video reviews, written reviews, box office receipts, comments and forum posts... These are the only things which can create anything close to a "measurement" of quality for any movie. The problem is you've already preemptively dismissed them without offering any sort of alternative of what could BETTER represent the quality of a movie than peoples' reaction to it, so all you're doing is sabotaging yourself. But WE'RE the closed-minded ones, aren't we? -_-