Yes, that is subjective.
""The story is completely unoriginal with several elements lifted directly from more successful movies" is fact. " Not it's not. Do you even know what "originality" is? If it was "completely unoriginal" then you're basically saying "every movie is unoriginal" because every movie uses something. And deciding that it's "bad" because of your length of what original is, ALSO subjective too.
"Zootopia is an excellent movie. It doesn't add much new to anything though. We've seen buddy cops, we've seen betrayals, we've seen anthro worlds. But! It does them so well that it doesn't matter. Everything it does was done nearly perfectly." That's still your opinion. Not a fact.
Honestly, you basically proved my justice into why I argued your article.
You said the designs are "poor" like it really is when it's not your art. Saying it's "poor" is not the same as saying "It's not my thing.".
And now you're basically saying your opinion on story is "fact" when by definition, you're still being subjective.
Art is subjective, what is "original or not" is, which hell, you even admit Zootopia is also less original, but then you basically said that it doesn't matter because you liked it anyway (subjective?).
As you said, critics need to be fair... and that's what I'm arguing that the article you made were unfair. I have a right to say it wrong, and I can see many errors in your article, even something in there sounds like an ignorance to how designing unique characters work in the visual section.
Sadly, SOME people act like I'm not allowed to disagree with your article.
Even you insult me as a writer, yourself.
Yes, that is subjective.
""The story is completely unoriginal with several elements lifted directly from more successful movies" is fact. "
Not it's not. Do you even know what "originality" is? If it was "completely unoriginal" then you're basically saying "every movie is unoriginal" because every movie uses something. And deciding that it's "bad" because of your length of what original is, ALSO subjective too.
"Zootopia is an excellent movie. It doesn't add much new to anything though. We've seen buddy cops, we've seen betrayals, we've seen anthro worlds. But! It does them so well that it doesn't matter. Everything it does was done nearly perfectly."
That's still your opinion. Not a fact.
Honestly, you basically proved my justice into why I argued your article.
You said the designs are "poor" like it really is when it's not your art. Saying it's "poor" is not the same as saying "It's not my thing.".
And now you're basically saying your opinion on story is "fact" when by definition, you're still being subjective.
Art is subjective, what is "original or not" is, which hell, you even admit Zootopia is also less original, but then you basically said that it doesn't matter because you liked it anyway (subjective?).
As you said, critics need to be fair... and that's what I'm arguing that the article you made were unfair. I have a right to say it wrong, and I can see many errors in your article, even something in there sounds like an ignorance to how designing unique characters work in the visual section.
Sadly, SOME people act like I'm not allowed to disagree with your article.
Even you insult me as a writer, yourself.