Creative Commons license icon

Reply to comment

That's one reason the sites I run tend to allow both heated rhetoric and argument with it - e.g. Inkbunny doesn't have that "call-out" rule in terms of expressing disagreement with an individual's ideas, while still forbidding requests to others to harass them generally, and allowing members to ban each other. But it's a hard line to police, and rarely a popular policy, so I can see why other sites choose differently.

The thing I'd caution against is coming in out of the blue to, say, shout "you're a [racist/Commie/Sonic-hater/pervert], you shouldn't be here", without any immediate cause. That's different, in my mind, to arguing against a position expressed in a journal, or embodied in a submission, because that's responding to a bad action, rather than treating them as a one-dimensional bad person (which is no better than what many of the more objectionable philosophies do to groups of people).

[Submissions can be problematic where people take a mere symbol of a group as promotion of philosophies associated with the group. But this is not unusual, nor restricted to political symbols. Diapers have been hugely contentious; I saw people getting stressed over latex on ArtSpots, etc.]

Reply

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <img> <b> <i> <s> <blockquote> <ul> <ol> <li> <table> <tr> <td> <th> <sub> <sup> <object> <embed> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <dl> <dt> <dd> <param> <center> <strong> <q> <cite> <code> <em>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This test is to prevent automated spam submissions.
Leave empty.