Because you were trying to make it into a black and white issue. You still are. But as the cases above show, there's debate about precisely what behaviour should be tolerated. And it's these kinds of decisions which conventions are going to have to deal with. Is a flag on a fursuit speech enough? Do we condemn based on hearsay, or require open support - or threats?
Because you were trying to make it into a black and white issue. You still are. But as the cases above show, there's debate about precisely what behaviour should be tolerated. And it's these kinds of decisions which conventions are going to have to deal with. Is a flag on a fursuit speech enough? Do we condemn based on hearsay, or require open support - or threats?
As far as I know, political extremism has not been a topic of debate at past FCLRs, but it's probably on the schedule for this year - if not already under debate on their Slack server.