What's the intent of the article? Is it the death of a person in the fandom, the reaction to the death, or larger commentary on the ongoing strife related to Raiders?
I can't really say it's about the death except maybe tangentially, because the article only mentions his name, when and how he died, and that he was a member of the Furry Raiders. Would he have been notable if he was not a member?
What's the intent of the article? Is it the death of a person in the fandom, the reaction to the death, or larger commentary on the ongoing strife related to Raiders?
I can't really say it's about the death except maybe tangentially, because the article only mentions his name, when and how he died, and that he was a member of the Furry Raiders. Would he have been notable if he was not a member?
All in all, not sure how to take this one.