To avoid comment shrinking, I will be replying to an earlier comment but still replying to the other one.
"NO ONE is trying to "shame you" for liking these wolf designs. You just decide to interpret it as such, and therefore EVERYONE saying they think the wolves are ugly is a personal attack to you and freedom."
Why are you even bothering trying to argue older points? Is it that thing about freedom again?
Also, when you try to argue and argue again that it's "bad" to express it, it might be a problem in terms of the freedom argument. And of course another problem. But anyway that wolf design thing is an example, I've seen people TRYING to shame people for having the right to express FNAF shipping kinda. By kinda, I wasn't sure if the picture violated the rules however.
"Yeah, and you sound like a moron every time you do. "THIS IS THE WAY THINGS ARE AND YOU CAN'T PROVE IT OTHERWISE, maybe...""
Insults huh?
"Jesus Christ, THAT WAS SARCASM, YOU IDIOT!!! When you're trying to make the argument for ANYTHING, OF COURSE you want to be honest!!! It's bad enough that you have no idea what you're talking about, but LYING on top of it IS NOT A GOOD THING!!"
Sometimes lying is a good thing. And also, you still complain at me many times I use an honest thought, like me questioning popular belief, which you then attempt to shame me for, of course.
"Such as?"
Lack of evidence, while at the same time, evidence on the opposite side is superior.
Another problem is using unrealistic and what may be hypocritical by claiming a dog doing the f***ing is still "rape" toward the dog. Like... WTF?!
Sure setting a trap is a thing, but I don't see this always being the case.
Oh and BTW, when I said I wanted the world to end with solar flares, that wasn't criticism, just a personal thing. ;)
To avoid comment shrinking, I will be replying to an earlier comment but still replying to the other one.
"NO ONE is trying to "shame you" for liking these wolf designs. You just decide to interpret it as such, and therefore EVERYONE saying they think the wolves are ugly is a personal attack to you and freedom."
Why are you even bothering trying to argue older points? Is it that thing about freedom again?
Also, when you try to argue and argue again that it's "bad" to express it, it might be a problem in terms of the freedom argument. And of course another problem. But anyway that wolf design thing is an example, I've seen people TRYING to shame people for having the right to express FNAF shipping kinda. By kinda, I wasn't sure if the picture violated the rules however.
"Yeah, and you sound like a moron every time you do. "THIS IS THE WAY THINGS ARE AND YOU CAN'T PROVE IT OTHERWISE, maybe...""
Insults huh?
"Jesus Christ, THAT WAS SARCASM, YOU IDIOT!!! When you're trying to make the argument for ANYTHING, OF COURSE you want to be honest!!! It's bad enough that you have no idea what you're talking about, but LYING on top of it IS NOT A GOOD THING!!"
Sometimes lying is a good thing. And also, you still complain at me many times I use an honest thought, like me questioning popular belief, which you then attempt to shame me for, of course.
"Such as?"
Lack of evidence, while at the same time, evidence on the opposite side is superior.
Another problem is using unrealistic and what may be hypocritical by claiming a dog doing the f***ing is still "rape" toward the dog. Like... WTF?!
Sure setting a trap is a thing, but I don't see this always being the case.
Oh and BTW, when I said I wanted the world to end with solar flares, that wasn't criticism, just a personal thing. ;)
Account abandoned and probably will make a new anonymous account with no trace of evidence of it being me. I think it's justified.