As far as I know, Uncle Kage wanted the right to edit the final cut, choose which recordings of the Anthrocon / him could and could not appear, and that was a requirement to film in the convention. I don't know at which point Video refused the agreement, either before or after having recorded, but Video's lawyer responded to Kage by saying this demand is a violation of the creative rights of the film maker, at which point Kage did not continue further communications with him.
The decision to ban Video from Anthrocon would be based on violating / dissenting to the terms of this agreement.
The lines media can and cannot cross are normally defined on a case-by-case basis (besides general rules), especially when we're talking about such a zealous board in regards to media.
As far as I know, Uncle Kage wanted the right to edit the final cut, choose which recordings of the Anthrocon / him could and could not appear, and that was a requirement to film in the convention. I don't know at which point Video refused the agreement, either before or after having recorded, but Video's lawyer responded to Kage by saying this demand is a violation of the creative rights of the film maker, at which point Kage did not continue further communications with him.
The decision to ban Video from Anthrocon would be based on violating / dissenting to the terms of this agreement.
The lines media can and cannot cross are normally defined on a case-by-case basis (besides general rules), especially when we're talking about such a zealous board in regards to media.