This is an analytical response I can agree with, and I could express myself, but the article is self-evidently non-analytical nor it pretends to be, or so I gather so far. It's like arguing technical proportions on an abstract canvas / nonrepresentational art. It is someone's opinion.
We agree an in-depth discussion on an abstract (loaded) quality may adequately begin by defining it: originality, creativity, beauty, goodness... It is not the case.
I will use though a utilitarian perspective, to which Stuart Mill would agree (mentioned in Rakuen Growlithe's signature): what furry fandom accomplishes exceedingly, is at making people happy.
This is an analytical response I can agree with, and I could express myself, but the article is self-evidently non-analytical nor it pretends to be, or so I gather so far. It's like arguing technical proportions on an abstract canvas / nonrepresentational art. It is someone's opinion.
We agree an in-depth discussion on an abstract (loaded) quality may adequately begin by defining it: originality, creativity, beauty, goodness... It is not the case.
I will use though a utilitarian perspective, to which Stuart Mill would agree (mentioned in Rakuen Growlithe's signature): what furry fandom accomplishes exceedingly, is at making people happy.