You start out the creative/original section by saying being based on something else does not make something less creative/original, then you go on to say that, actually, sometimes it does make it less creative/original because of plot, but then go to say that using tropes doesn't make something not creative/original, and even then, you say, actually, nothing is original. So I'm having trouble trying to understand what you're even trying to say there.
You start out the creative/original section by saying being based on something else does not make something less creative/original, then you go on to say that, actually, sometimes it does make it less creative/original because of plot, but then go to say that using tropes doesn't make something not creative/original, and even then, you say, actually, nothing is original. So I'm having trouble trying to understand what you're even trying to say there.