I believe [adjective][species] still considers itself a "website;" however, it hasn't even made the recommended list two years in a row, but in 2013, it was still listed as a website. Also, I seem to remember them running an article badmouthing the Ursa Majors like the week after nominees were announced last year; it was a bit of bad timing, what with the lack of a nomination last ear. Looked like sour grapes (though I really doubt it had much to do with their lack of nomination).
I believe [adjective][species] still considers itself a "website;" however, it hasn't even made the recommended list two years in a row, but in 2013, it was still listed as a website. Also, I seem to remember them running an article badmouthing the Ursa Majors like the week after nominees were announced last year; it was a bit of bad timing, what with the lack of a nomination last ear. Looked like sour grapes (though I really doubt it had much to do with their lack of nomination).