Though less flippantly, I don't know if we need to be [adjective][species] when [adjective][species] does a better job at "being [adjectice][species]" than we could.
The three frequently updated furry "news" sites (I'm counting us, [a][s] and Patch) each have different ideologies about what we're supposed to be doing; I think that helps everyone out, both readers and writers. Possibly a "well-informed" furry should be vaguely aware of all three's articles (and hence the footer at the bottom our page), but if you prefer [a][s]'s style, there's nothing wrong with reading/writing for [a][s]. As for you personally, if you decide you wanted to write more along the lines of [a][s], and wanted an experience more along that line, well, you are allowed to write for them, if they'll take you. You didn't sign an exclusive contract with us. (Of course, if you decided to submit them here, I mean, this subthread started with me worrying about lack of content, so of course we'd run it.) Vice versa, I doubt they would take it as a betrayal if you decided to write for both of us. Which is also a good point to make; you're not actually going to get much done with comments. Whatever direction you want to take anything in, you should probably be a bit more active with the actual content you produce.
However, I'm not entirely sure what this has to do with plays?
Though less flippantly, I don't know if we need to be [adjective][species] when [adjective][species] does a better job at "being [adjectice][species]" than we could.
The three frequently updated furry "news" sites (I'm counting us, [a][s] and Patch) each have different ideologies about what we're supposed to be doing; I think that helps everyone out, both readers and writers. Possibly a "well-informed" furry should be vaguely aware of all three's articles (and hence the footer at the bottom our page), but if you prefer [a][s]'s style, there's nothing wrong with reading/writing for [a][s]. As for you personally, if you decide you wanted to write more along the lines of [a][s], and wanted an experience more along that line, well, you are allowed to write for them, if they'll take you. You didn't sign an exclusive contract with us. (Of course, if you decided to submit them here, I mean, this subthread started with me worrying about lack of content, so of course we'd run it.) Vice versa, I doubt they would take it as a betrayal if you decided to write for both of us. Which is also a good point to make; you're not actually going to get much done with comments. Whatever direction you want to take anything in, you should probably be a bit more active with the actual content you produce.
However, I'm not entirely sure what this has to do with plays?