Creative Commons license icon

Reply to comment

Not a comment about the review so much as a comment about reviews. When a book or movie is reviewed we know it's possible for anyone to see that. When someone does a con report then it also has a wide audience and can probably be generalised for more other furry cons. Being retrospective it necessarily has to be unless someone has a Tardis or DeLorean in the garage. But when it comes to a play, does a review really benefit Flayrah's audience? Unless one is the direct vicinity of the play you have no opportunity to see it. People won't fly across the country or from another country to see a play (I know one fur who did that for The Lion King but he's odd). Plays are also seldom recorded for others to see after the fact and, even when they are, watching a play is a totally different experience than watching a video and they don't carry over well.

"If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind."
~John Stuart Mill~

Reply

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <img> <b> <i> <s> <blockquote> <ul> <ol> <li> <table> <tr> <td> <th> <sub> <sup> <object> <embed> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <dl> <dt> <dd> <param> <center> <strong> <q> <cite> <code> <em>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This test is to prevent automated spam submissions.
Leave empty.