As I read it, the crux of his argument was that the UMA shouldn't support work which makes furry look bad; and that their promotion was inappropriate (comparedtohis) because their goal must have been to make the UMAs/furry look bad. Also, that they'd keep winning because they were popular; and I think he was hinting that a significant amount of the votes were not from furries and therefore should not be considered eligible.
He did try to draw a distinction between internal criticism by, say, Shawn Keller - I didn't think that was particularly convincing because, if anything, Shawn's work was more controversial at the time. In addition, it was suggested that votes had come in for many other categories, not just the one containing Furry Force.
As I read it, the crux of his argument was that the UMA shouldn't support work which makes furry look bad; and that their promotion was inappropriate (compared to his) because their goal must have been to make the UMAs/furry look bad. Also, that they'd keep winning because they were popular; and I think he was hinting that a significant amount of the votes were not from furries and therefore should not be considered eligible.
He did try to draw a distinction between internal criticism by, say, Shawn Keller - I didn't think that was particularly convincing because, if anything, Shawn's work was more controversial at the time. In addition, it was suggested that votes had come in for many other categories, not just the one containing Furry Force.